Ugly looking cross staff slur

Discussions about our next-generation scoring application, Dorico.
dannemoller
Junior Member
Posts: 137
Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2014 5:25 pm
Contact:

Ugly looking cross staff slur

Post by dannemoller »

Hi again!

I know that there's probably still work to do on this area by the Dorico team. But in the meantime, are there any settings that you good people recommend that can make it look better? There are quite a few of these in the score, and so a bit of a chore to alter everyone manually.
Attachments
Slurs.PNG
(4.74 KiB) Not downloaded yet

User avatar
benwiggy
Senior Member
Posts: 2054
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2016 8:09 pm
Contact:

Re: Ugly looking cross staff slur

Post by benwiggy »

I have generally found better results by reducing the height of long slurs, down from 3 to 2 ¼.

Also try changing "Maximum angle for cross staff slurs".
MacMini 2018, 3GHz i5, 32Gb RAM | MacBook Pro 2014, 2.2 GHz i7 | Garritan Personal Orchestra 5
Ancient Groove Music

User avatar
Claude Lapalme
Member
Posts: 621
Joined: Wed May 18, 2016 6:29 pm
Location: Red Deer, Alberta, Canada
Contact:

Re: Ugly looking cross staff slur

Post by Claude Lapalme »

Sometimes, I'll turn off collision avoidance in the Properties Panel for the offending slurs (and then propagate). It makes them a little flat, but it's often a better starting point. Your excerpt looks a lot like Howard Blake's Snowman. If that's the case, then yes: there are a lot of those! Therefore you should filter them and turn off collision all at once to see what it looks like as a starting point. If not, Engraving Properties changes, as suggested above, would be less tedious with a little experimentation.
Claude Lapalme - Conductor, Arranger, Orchestrator
Music Director @ Red Deer Symphony Orchestra
Artistic Director @ Rosa Barocca
-------------------------------------------------------------
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 8-Core 3.59 GHz - Windows 10 Pro
Sound BlasterX G6 - Dorico 3.1.10 - Note Performer 3.3.1

John Ruggero
Member
Posts: 271
Joined: Tue May 24, 2016 11:09 pm
Contact:

Re: Ugly looking cross staff slur

Post by John Ruggero »

It would be interesting to see the results with the recommended settings changes. Here is the result using default settings in Finale and no hand adjustment:
Finale default slurs.jpeg
(20.08 KiB) Not downloaded yet

User avatar
Claude Lapalme
Member
Posts: 621
Joined: Wed May 18, 2016 6:29 pm
Location: Red Deer, Alberta, Canada
Contact:

Re: Ugly looking cross staff slur

Post by Claude Lapalme »

The cross slurs and a couple of other slurs in Dorico do need some love; that's acknowledged. But simply turning off the "automatic auto curve adjustment" (which I mistakenly named collision avoidance above), gives results that, while not optimal, are already much better without manual adjustments. But there's still obviously a road ahead towards improvements.
slurs1.jpg
(36.86 KiB) Not downloaded yet
Claude Lapalme - Conductor, Arranger, Orchestrator
Music Director @ Red Deer Symphony Orchestra
Artistic Director @ Rosa Barocca
-------------------------------------------------------------
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 8-Core 3.59 GHz - Windows 10 Pro
Sound BlasterX G6 - Dorico 3.1.10 - Note Performer 3.3.1

John Ruggero
Member
Posts: 271
Joined: Tue May 24, 2016 11:09 pm
Contact:

Re: Ugly looking cross staff slur

Post by John Ruggero »

Thanks, Claude. I really hope that the Dorico designers will study Finale's slurs carefully. I, for one, will never move to software that doesn't give as good a result.

User avatar
pianoleo
Grand Senior Member
Posts: 7725
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 11:17 am
Location: London, UK
Contact:

Re: Ugly looking cross staff slur

Post by pianoleo »

"Default settings" for slurs, John, but not for the actual document. Try using the Document Setup Wizard, with all defaults (and a default Grand Staff instrument), then inputting your example. With Finale 25.5 I get this piece of engraving beauty:

Image

I think I'll stick with Dorico!
Pianist/accompanist/engraver/arranger
2019 Macbook Pro 16" 2.3gGHz 8-core i9, 32GB RAM,
2015 Macbook Pro 13" Retina 3.1GHz dual-core i7, 8GB RAM; running Sibelius Ultimate, Logic Pro X, Dorico Pro 3.5 etc.
& 2017 HP ZBook Studio G3 15.6” UHD quad-i7, 16GB RAM, Windows 10 Pro
Sibelius user since Sibelius 7 (Acorn, 1997), Ex-Sibelius user since Dorico 1.0

John Ruggero
Member
Posts: 271
Joined: Tue May 24, 2016 11:09 pm
Contact:

Re: Ugly looking cross staff slur

Post by John Ruggero »

pianoleo, I created my example as you did, but moved the staves a normal distance from each other to duplicate those in the original post. The slurs do distort when the staves are very far apart as in your example. That doesn't concern me because I would never have piano staves this far apart, and the majority of slur shapes in Finale are so close to what I need without reshaping, especially when I use my own settings rather than the default ones. So I will stick to Finale for now, but hope that Dorico will eventually get the results I need for my work, because there are some aspects of Dorico that could be very helpful.

User avatar
dankreider
Grand Senior Member
Posts: 5267
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2018 3:45 pm
Contact:

Re: Ugly looking cross staff slur

Post by dankreider »

Those slurs are so wispy... yuck!
Dan Kreider
hymnworks.com
Dorico 3, Windows 10

User avatar
Romanos401
Senior Member
Posts: 1616
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 4:18 am
Location: USA
Contact:

Re: Ugly looking cross staff slur

Post by Romanos401 »

Look at the slurs portion of the engraving rules. You can manipulate MANY parameters... odds are if you fiddle with them a bit you’ll get Dorico to generate what you want by default. 5 mins tweaking settings there (and then save as default) will save you hours in the future.
🎵 Director of Sacred Music, Organist, Choral Conductor, Composer; Adjunct Organ Instructor at Goshen College
💾 Dorico 3.5 pro, Noteperformer, Hauptwerk 5 Advanced, StudioOne pro 4.6, On1 2020, FinalCut Pro, Camtasia, Wavelab Elements
🖥 iMac w/32gb ram, MacMini w/16gb ram, Stream Deck (& SDXL), SaffirePro40, NuForce uDAC
🎹 Alesis VI 61, 3m Organ Console

John Ruggero
Member
Posts: 271
Joined: Tue May 24, 2016 11:09 pm
Contact:

Re: Ugly looking cross staff slur

Post by John Ruggero »

Romano, during my last trial, I did tweak the Dorico slurs by means of the settings and got close to what I wanted in terms of the overall slur shape. However, changing the slur contour for the the different situations that occur, such as in the original example, was laborious. I have mentioned this before and thought this was another opportunity to prod Dorico to investigate why it is so much easier to achieve pleasing slur shapes in Finale than in Dorico.

Of course, if Dorico is happy with the Dorico slurs as they are and doesn't see a difference between Dorico slurs and those in fine engraving, then I doubt there will be improvement, and I doubt that I will ever switch over.

User avatar
dankreider
Grand Senior Member
Posts: 5267
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2018 3:45 pm
Contact:

Re: Ugly looking cross staff slur

Post by dankreider »

John, I very much agree with your point about the angles. And slurs across systems are still pretty rough. I mostly just don't like the pointy ends.
Dan Kreider
hymnworks.com
Dorico 3, Windows 10

notesetter
Junior Member
Posts: 171
Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2016 6:51 pm
Contact:

Re: Ugly looking cross staff slur

Post by notesetter »

dankreider wrote:
Wed Jan 22, 2020 4:16 am
I mostly just don't like the pointy ends.
If we're talking about Finale, the slur tips and body thickness are adjustable.
Image
Attachments
Screen Shot 2020-01-22 at 4.40.00 AM.png
(206.48 KiB) Not downloaded yet
Bruce

Dorico PRO 3.5
Finale 2012c, 25.5, 26.2
Mac mini, OSX 10.12.6

Never tell someone how to do something. Tell them what to do and they will surprise you with their ingenuity.
–General George S. Patton Jr

User avatar
dankreider
Grand Senior Member
Posts: 5267
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2018 3:45 pm
Contact:

Re: Ugly looking cross staff slur

Post by dankreider »

Yep, I just don’t know why that isn’t the default. I guess if you’re the programmers, after 30+ years, you don’t mess with defaults.
Dan Kreider
hymnworks.com
Dorico 3, Windows 10

John Ruggero
Member
Posts: 271
Joined: Tue May 24, 2016 11:09 pm
Contact:

Re: Ugly looking cross staff slur

Post by John Ruggero »

dankreider wrote:
Wed Jan 22, 2020 2:18 pm
Yep, I just don’t know why that isn’t the default. I guess if you’re the programmers, after 30+ years, you don’t mess with defaults.
Aside from lethargy at MM, the reason might be that slur shape is a question of taste. Several years ago Notat.io members went through all the Finale defaults and came up with settings that produce better results.

For example, here what I prefer in Finale using my own settings and with very slight hand work:
slur shape and contour.png
(85.55 KiB) Not downloaded yet
Image
And I wish that I could actually display my examples in the post the way I see them above! What is the magic?
Last edited by John Ruggero on Fri Jan 24, 2020 5:44 pm, edited 10 times in total.

Rob Tuley
Grand Senior Member
Posts: 3776
Joined: Fri May 20, 2016 12:41 am

Re: Ugly looking cross staff slur

Post by Rob Tuley »

I would guess that if you changed the defaults after 30 years, you would have thousands of complaints from angry customers who had spent the last 30 years thinking the old default version looked perfect.

User avatar
dankreider
Grand Senior Member
Posts: 5267
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2018 3:45 pm
Contact:

Re: Ugly looking cross staff slur

Post by dankreider »

John Ruggero wrote:
Wed Jan 22, 2020 3:49 pm
I wish that I could actually display my examples in the post the way I see them above! What is the magic?
This forum is really lame when it comes to things like posting photos and files. Your pics have to be less than 600 pixels. Then you have to host the image somewhere, get a link, and put that link into the post using the "img" tags.
Dan Kreider
hymnworks.com
Dorico 3, Windows 10

notesetter
Junior Member
Posts: 171
Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2016 6:51 pm
Contact:

Re: Ugly looking cross staff slur

Post by notesetter »

John Ruggero wrote:
Wed Jan 22, 2020 3:49 pm
And I wish that I could actually display my examples in the post the way I see them above! What is the magic?
John, this is what I do:

Post your response just the way you have above. When you view your post, right click on the link displayed at the bottom ("slur shape and contour.jpeg" in your post above) and select "Copy Link Location". Edit your post (click on the pencil icon) and add a "Insert URL" (chain link) and paste the copied link location into it. When you post this edit, you'll see your graphic displayed.
Bruce

Dorico PRO 3.5
Finale 2012c, 25.5, 26.2
Mac mini, OSX 10.12.6

Never tell someone how to do something. Tell them what to do and they will surprise you with their ingenuity.
–General George S. Patton Jr

b_e_n
Junior Member
Posts: 67
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2018 6:19 pm
Contact:

Re: Ugly looking cross staff slur

Post by b_e_n »

If you increase the shoulders' offset and decrease the slur end thickness the result is much better.
offset shoulders.png
(139.85 KiB) Not downloaded yet
slur end thickness.png
(96.78 KiB) Not downloaded yet
cross staff slurs.png
(31.48 KiB) Not downloaded yet

User avatar
Daniel at Steinberg
Moderator
Posts: 17656
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 10:35 am
Contact:

Re: Ugly looking cross staff slur

Post by Daniel at Steinberg »

John Ruggero wrote:
Wed Jan 22, 2020 4:09 am
Of course, if Dorico is happy with the Dorico slurs as they are and doesn't see a difference between Dorico slurs and those in fine engraving, then I doubt there will be improvement, and I doubt that I will ever switch over.
Dorico is a computer program, and (to the best of my knowledge) is not self-aware, so it is unable to make any comparisons for itself between what it has been programmed to do by its humans and the slurs produced by other humans. But I'm you know this very well and you have some strange reason for talking obliquely about the humans who actually build Dorico in this way.

John Ruggero
Member
Posts: 271
Joined: Tue May 24, 2016 11:09 pm
Contact:

Re: Ugly looking cross staff slur

Post by John Ruggero »

Sorry Daniel, I originally wrote "if the Dorico community is happy with..." but then thought that was presumptuous and changed it to the strange phrasing because I didn't really know how to put it. I realize now that I should have written "If everyone is happy with..."

Notesetter, I will try that to see if my examples will appear.
Last edited by John Ruggero on Thu Jan 23, 2020 5:38 pm, edited 2 times in total.

John Ruggero
Member
Posts: 271
Joined: Tue May 24, 2016 11:09 pm
Contact:

Re: Ugly looking cross staff slur

Post by John Ruggero »

I tried it, notesetter, but didn't get the result desired. See my post above. After I control-clicked the link (since I am on a Mac), I choose "Copy Link Address" since I didn't see Copy Link Location as one of the possible choices. Maybe that made a difference?

John Ruggero
Member
Posts: 271
Joined: Tue May 24, 2016 11:09 pm
Contact:

Re: Ugly looking cross staff slur

Post by John Ruggero »

b_e-n, thank you very much. That is kind of thing I did to tweak the Dorico slurs and achieved much better results.

In my opinion, your final example of the cross staff slurs is excellent, but does suffer from the extreme arching that one sees in a lot of computer engraving now, even from the best publishers like Henle and Baerentreiter. The best plate engraving of the past, for example, that by the same two publishers, avoided this because over-arched slurs stand out too much and take up too much of the empty space on the page in a way that impedes reading. And it is less visually pleasing because the slurs don't seem to track the path of the notes as well.

In any case, I found such necessary adjustments to slurs to be harder in Dorico than Finale. Ironically, it seemed that the higher degree of control over the motion of the control points in Dorico gave too much opportunity to misshape the slurs to create unintended bulges etc. With Finale the user is somehow protected from this, which makes shaping the slurs much easier. Perhaps having two levels of control over the slurs, fine and less fine, would be helpful.
Last edited by John Ruggero on Fri Jan 24, 2020 3:46 am, edited 2 times in total.

notesetter
Junior Member
Posts: 171
Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2016 6:51 pm
Contact:

Re: Ugly looking cross staff slur

Post by notesetter »

John Ruggero wrote:
Thu Jan 23, 2020 5:02 pm
I tried it, notesetter, but didn't get the result desired. See my post above. After I control-clicked the link (since I am on a Mac), I choose "Copy Link Address" since I didn't see Copy Link Location as one of the possible choices. Maybe that made a difference?
I use the Firefox browser and it definitely says "Copy Link Location". "Copy Link Address" must be the same as I see it. Take another look at my steps and feel free to contact me privately.
Bruce

Dorico PRO 3.5
Finale 2012c, 25.5, 26.2
Mac mini, OSX 10.12.6

Never tell someone how to do something. Tell them what to do and they will surprise you with their ingenuity.
–General George S. Patton Jr

User avatar
Romanos401
Senior Member
Posts: 1616
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 4:18 am
Location: USA
Contact:

Re: Ugly looking cross staff slur

Post by Romanos401 »

Just click on the image once it is uploaded and when the image page loads, copy the url.
🎵 Director of Sacred Music, Organist, Choral Conductor, Composer; Adjunct Organ Instructor at Goshen College
💾 Dorico 3.5 pro, Noteperformer, Hauptwerk 5 Advanced, StudioOne pro 4.6, On1 2020, FinalCut Pro, Camtasia, Wavelab Elements
🖥 iMac w/32gb ram, MacMini w/16gb ram, Stream Deck (& SDXL), SaffirePro40, NuForce uDAC
🎹 Alesis VI 61, 3m Organ Console

Post Reply

Return to “Dorico”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: benwiggy, John Murdoch, Rob Tuley, sspharis, Ulf and 6 guests