Old or new mixer better?

For users of legacy Steinberg Cubase software
MikeInBoston
New Member
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2012 2:54 am
Contact:

Old or new mixer better?

Post by MikeInBoston »

Title says it all.

Mike
Mike

KBJRock
Junior Member
Posts: 129
Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2011 9:09 am
Contact:

Re: Anybody else like the old mixer better?

Post by KBJRock »

I like the new one better for it´s features and potential, but because it´s so slow, laggy and buggy, it´s totally unusable for me. So the old one is still definitely better and the only one I can use.

And yeah, I have 12-core Mac Pro + 16GB of RAM. 6.5.4 and 7.0.2 installed side by side. 7.0.2 is just terribly slow and laggy.

User avatar
raino
Grand Senior Member
Posts: 4680
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2010 2:41 am
Location: San Francisco
Contact:

Re: Anybody else like the old mixer better?

Post by raino »

While the new mixer certainly needs some fixes and improvements (which I'm sure it will get in due time), I vastly prefer it to the old one. The channel visibility and zones alone are enough to win my vote, and there are so many other advances. For me the pluses outweigh the minuses right now and that ratio should improve over time.
rodger

Cubase Pro 10.5, Win10 Home, Halion6, Groove Agent 5, WaveLab Pro 10, BFD3, GPO, Komplete Ultimate 9, Waves Gold, Misc. other

i7 4771 Haswell Processor 3.5GHz, ADK LGA1150, 16GB RAM, GeForce GTX970, RME Fireface 400, 2x UAD-2

Latest: Bawdy Politik https://rodgerraino.bandcamp.com/releases

User avatar
DaDa
Member
Posts: 456
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2010 3:22 am
Contact:

Re: Anybody else like the old mixer better?

Post by DaDa »

Another fan of the old one, here.

Some good ideas in V7, but ergonomics are (currently) worse.

And again ... the traditional workslow enhancements !
:|


Jan
Last edited by DaDa on Fri Feb 22, 2013 3:07 am, edited 1 time in total.
Intel Z87 | i5 4670K @ 4x 4,2gHz | 16gb RAM | 6850 silent | 37", 2x 24", 22" LCDs|
System SSD | 7tb Data HDs
RME RayDat | Focusrite Scarlett 18i8 | Steinberg UR 824
Win7 SP1 64bit | Cubase 8.5.20 64bit | Samplitude X3 64bit
Sony VAIO | Intel 2x 2,4 gHz | Win 7 SP1 64bit | Cubase 6.5.5
Steinberg user since Commodore

sonic_74
New Member
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2011 5:39 pm
Contact:

Re: Anybody else like the old mixer better?

Post by sonic_74 »

I like the older mixer better. It's faster, simpler, easier.. But of course, if I was making music with 6-8 tracks, I wouldn't complain.

Anyway, for me, more important than the mixconsole is the editing window for audio channels. (in fact all channels other than midi)

Especially the first line of that window is so garbled, I lose focus of what I'm making at that moment. It's good to see new functions there, like browsing through channels, seeing where that channel outputs to, etc, but maybe some more thought could be put there, so it can be simpler. (The cliché comes to mind: iphone wouldn't be a success if it had more than one button down the screen)

The easiest solution to the old/new mixer discussion is to put them both in Cubase 7. But maybe that will eat even more resources... :?

Sonic
Sonic
______________________________________

i7 2600K - Asus P8Z68-V Pro Mainboard - 16 GB 1833 MHz RAM - Windows 7 64bit - Cubase 6.0.3

Audiocave
Member
Posts: 434
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 5:52 pm
Contact:

Re: Anybody else like the old mixer better?

Post by Audiocave »

As an observer (waiting for the demo to try it) it seems they maybe took the legitmate criticisms of the old mixer and overreacted and tried to do too much. However ... that's a peanut gallery impression since I haven't laid hands on it yet.

All I ever mostly wanted was full screen, resizable, sends and inserts across the console at the same time, and moving mixer channels at will. They could have left the graphics just like they were and I would have been (2 years ago or so anyway) happy enough with those changes.

I haven't tried to sort it all out, but I wonder, percentage wise, how many of the changes is stuff people actually asked for?

User avatar
Rumdrum
Member
Posts: 549
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2011 1:08 am
Contact:

Re: Anybody else like the old mixer better?

Post by Rumdrum »

The NEW mixer is far better than the old one. Will NEVER go back. In fact it is one of the best improvements in the CB series up til now. My workflow is much faster than with the old one. Like with every new program you need to dig into it and LEARN it. Can´t expect it to be in your fingers when you open the program. It took me approx two hours. That time I have later saved by the better workflow.

So what is better with the new mixer?

First the channels can be arranged in groups and save as templates. The sequence within the group is also easier to set then before. For larger project this is a great time saver. No more time wasting scrolling at the bottom to find the correct channel.

Secondly the re-seizing.

Third the pictures. I am surprised on how much time I save finding the correct channel with an added picture. Logic has had it for years but only on the tracks. It is so more useful in the mixer.

Fourth the notepad. Adds even more information that makes life easier when mixing.

I would also guess that if you use SB included plugs you would love the new user interface of the eq and the strip.

Sorry all you dissatisfied guys: You have not really taken the time - yet - you will. Love to discuss the same topic a year from now.
Mac Pro - Maverics 3,2Ghz - 20GB RAM - 22TB Disc, Cubase 10 + 4.5 (on PC/XP), Wavelab 9, iPad Remote, RME Hammerfall RAYDAT, Yamaha01V96, and a bucket of ice cream.

User avatar
ALSTUDIOS
Member
Posts: 296
Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2012 1:09 pm
Contact:

Re: Anybody else like the old mixer better?

Post by ALSTUDIOS »

Hi

I don't see any big advantage with the new mixer - but, it's a matter of time to get familiar with the new functionality and finally I will surely use it.


Cheers
******************************************************************************************
ALSTUDIOS REGENSDORF SWITZERLAND
******************************************************************************************
Win10 PRO 64bit, Cubase PRO 10.5.20 64bit,
pc specialist (UK), PC AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12x3.8GHz, ASUS 570 F 64GB RAM, NVIDIA GT 720, 2GB DDR3, Dual Monitor
RME fireface 800 firewire
AVID Artist Control + Euphonix MC Mix, EuControl v 2020.1

Guest

Re: Anybody else like the old mixer better?

Post by Guest »

I prefer the the Mix Console; once it is fine tuned it will be even better.

I think MC and C7 overall, is more geared toward's being mouse free and certainly benefits from a more complex controller setup.

However, SB need to address some of the missing attributes and key commands and then I will be very happy.

User avatar
marQs
Senior Member
Posts: 2289
Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2010 12:34 am
Contact:

Re: Anybody else like the old mixer better?

Post by marQs »

I'm definately a fan of the old mixer. Mix Console is full of great ideas but lots of them are not really sophisticated.

- much more clicking (double click to open plugin guis)
- less overview (pre/post states)
- need of vertical scrolling with good chance to change parameters accidentially
- inadequate optical separation of channels
- hard readability of inserts + levels (names layer numerical values)
- distracting animations
- insufficient display of selected channels from bottom to top
- incomplete key commands
- sluggish feel
- waste of screen space (rack bars, hi/lo cut filters)

The list goes on...
Rumdrum wrote: Sorry all you dissatisfied guys: You have not really taken the time - yet - you will. Love to discuss the same topic a year from now.
Sorry Rumdrum, I have taken the time. Tried to like it actually. As it is, Mix Console provides all functionalities to mix, some cool new things I could have use for in the future (Agents) but all for the price of speed. Some functions, like that extra nice, undocumented 'jump to routing destination' with ctrl + click are gone. Slow... Possibility to open plugin guis in FX channels from any channels' send: gone. And those are just the things that come to my mind within one minute.

If Mix Console has speeded up your workflow, you probably never learned to use the old one :mrgreen: (sorry, had to say it).
It's not our job to start a war of new vs. old. It's Steinberg's job to provide a software that's 'better' than previous versions. What we've got with Cubase 7 is a new surface (basically welcome) and loss of not-so-cool-looking but important small features (unacceptable).
Cubase 10.5 | WL 10 | Fireface UFX | UAD2 Octo (2x)/Quad PCI-e | Win10 Pro 64 | i7-7820 x | Asus Prime X299-A
http://www.secretsource.de
Authentic Drums - Sample Pack for Slate Trigger: https://www.authentic-audio.de/drum-sa ... e-trigger/

gmmccurdy
Junior Member
Posts: 194
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2011 6:37 pm
Contact:

Re: Anybody else like the old mixer better?

Post by gmmccurdy »

I love the new Mixer! As soon as they can isolate and fix the CPU spikes I'll start using 7 again! :) That's the biggest feature I miss since having to roll back to 6.5.
Mark
================================
Macbook Pro - OSX 10.11.3 - 2.3 GHz Intel Core i7
16GB 1600 MHz DDR3
500 Gig SSD Hard Drive
Presonus Firestudio Project I/O
Cubase 9
================================

sonic_74
New Member
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2011 5:39 pm
Contact:

Re: Anybody else like the old mixer better?

Post by sonic_74 »

Rumdrum wrote: Some functions, like that extra nice, undocumented 'jump to routing destination' with ctrl + click are gone.
That was a really genius feature. I really miss it. Those kinds of tricks make difference in speed.

I hope they forgot to put it...
Sonic
______________________________________

i7 2600K - Asus P8Z68-V Pro Mainboard - 16 GB 1833 MHz RAM - Windows 7 64bit - Cubase 6.0.3

northmusic
New Member
Posts: 34
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2013 6:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Anybody else like the old mixer better?

Post by northmusic »

It's the start of something good, I think.

It still needs a ton of work though, especially in graphics performance. It also needs a decent resolution screen all to itself. 1920x1200 makes a big difference.

dbombay1
Junior Member
Posts: 52
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 4:03 am
Contact:

Re: Anybody else like the old mixer better?

Post by dbombay1 »

Until they fix the key commands and workspace functionality I'm sticking with 6.5. I need to make music not mouse click on the mixer all day long.
D.A.
www.morris-young.com
Operating System: Windows 7 Pro 64-bit
Processor: 2.80GHz Quad-Core Intel Core i7-860
Motherboard: Gigabyte P55 Microboard
Memory: 8GB DDR3-1333 Dual Channel (4 x 2GB)
Graphics: DVI+VGA Fanless Graphics Card 512MB (HD4350)
RME Fireface 800 Lexicon MX400, Yamaha MO8, Yamaha SY77, Roland Synth Plus 60, Wurlitzer A200, Halion3.1, Addictive Drums, Stylus RMX, Omnisphere, EWQL Silver Orch, Reason 4, NIB4, BCF2000, Focusrite VM Pro, Micro Moog, Mandolin, Banjo, Fender Strat, Gibson SG, Hi Strung Strat

ganjabase2000
New Member
Posts: 25
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2011 12:42 am
Contact:

Re: Anybody else like the old mixer better?

Post by ganjabase2000 »

I Did, and wold of Luv'd an Undo Button on it. Perfect :twisted: :ugeek:
Sent From:The King @"Where The Wild Things Are"

MacBook Pro OSX 10.9.2, Mac Desktop 4Core OSX 10.8
Cubase7 64bit all are Up 2 Date
FireFace 400, UAD2 Card x's 2 Dual, Event TR8's x'2, Rodes NKT Mic w/ SE Reflection Filter.

Crotchety
Senior Member
Posts: 1180
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2011 10:26 pm
Contact:

Re: Anybody else like the old mixer better?

Post by Crotchety »

No. New one's far better, a few creases need ironing out and improvements will come once it's bedded in a bit, but I think it a vast improvement and I haven't even got into the nitty-gritty yet.

I particularly like the way I can navigate with the keyboard (makes recording yourself so much easier), the new rack features such as gate, transients control, tape sat, etc, speak for themselves, the new eq features are just fab to work with.

It just requires a bit of re-learning and adjustment of work-flow but if we let that become an issue we'll never get anywhere.

Big pat on the back to the dev team!
Instruments: Piano/keys, Guitar, Mandolin, Vocal
Current Sounds: Cactus Juice (@Soundcloud) - Former Sounds: Ask Murt (@MySpace)

Every day's a skool day...

WillB
Junior Member
Posts: 109
Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2011 8:50 pm
Contact:

Re: Anybody else like the old mixer better?

Post by WillB »

No
Nuendo 1, 2, 3 / Cubase 4, 5, 6, 7, 8. HP I7-6700k, RME UFX, Lenovo Thinkpad Workstation W540, RME UCX, Win 10 64b, Halion 5, RND 5033 5043, WaveLab 4-8, DMG EQ & Compression, Limitless RME ADI-8 2x, TAB 76m x2, Calrec PQ1061 x2, Ampex ATR-100 w/ LNP-2, Houston.

AAMedia
New Member
Posts: 31
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2010 3:30 am
Contact:

Re: Anybody else like the old mixer better?

Post by AAMedia »

No
PC - Core i7-3930K Sandy Bridge E (6 core), 16 GB RAM, Windows 10 Pro, Cubase 10 Pro, Steinberg UR28M

promotouk
Junior Member
Posts: 84
Joined: Tue May 01, 2012 11:10 pm
Contact:

Re: Anybody else like the old mixer better?

Post by promotouk »

I love everything about the new 7 version the mixer is great so much better than the old one. It felt a bit clumsy at first but now I have got my head round it I love how fast I can get what I want without scrolling for ever and the fact with one click I can close or open any group of channels is brill. There is still a few bugs with colouring the mixer when trying to change it the box flashes like crazy not letting me pic the right colour or it will freeze. Still like any new big upgrade they will get it right in the next few months.

cubace
Member
Posts: 943
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2011 6:41 pm
Contact:

Re: Anybody else like the old mixer better?

Post by cubace »

The flexibility is nice, but the performance cost is to high. I might get used to it but for now the old one was better. And they have not solved the problem I had with the old one.

Guest

Re: Anybody else like the old mixer better?

Post by Guest »

LOVE the new mixer. I could never go back to C6.

User avatar
Sonico
Junior Member
Posts: 96
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 6:36 pm
Contact:

Re: Anybody else like the old mixer better?

Post by Sonico »

I love the new mixer too!!!

The mixer was the only thing that I didn't like on previous versions, and now is very very good IMO.
Cubase Pro 10.5
Focusrite Clarett 8pre USB
Desktop: Windows 10 64bit, Intel Core i7 3.2 Ghz, 16 GB RAM.
Laptop: Windows 10 64 bit, Intel Core i7 1.8 Ghz, 16 GB RAM.

User avatar
curteye
External Moderator
Posts: 4756
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2010 2:03 am
Contact:

Re: Anybody else like the old mixer better?

Post by curteye »

MikeInBoston wrote:Title says it all.Mike
Aloha M,
and my answer is no.
{'-'}
If yer gear ain't breakin down, you aint workin' much.

iMac 5K 4.2Gz 16GB
MBP 3.0Gz......16GB

Location:
On the side of a volcano in the middle of the Pacific Ocean.

User avatar
curteye
External Moderator
Posts: 4756
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2010 2:03 am
Contact:

Re: Anybody else like the old mixer better?

Post by curteye »

ganjabase2000 wrote:and wold of Luv'd an Undo Button on it. :
+1 Big tTime!

But is that possible?
{'-'}
If yer gear ain't breakin down, you aint workin' much.

iMac 5K 4.2Gz 16GB
MBP 3.0Gz......16GB

Location:
On the side of a volcano in the middle of the Pacific Ocean.

Betamac
Member
Posts: 261
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 11:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Anybody else like the old mixer better?

Post by Betamac »

Love the new Cubase - think it beats all!

would love an extended colour palette in the arrange page as standard - I keep banging on and one day :D
PC - Intel 3930k Hex core (oc'd at 4.5 gig), 16G DDR Ram, Windows 10 64 bit, Sapphire ATI Radeon 5770 Graphics, Big Screen in front, smaller screen at side. Cubase 64 Bit - Ozone 6, T Racks S3, Komplete 7 - Various Waves plugs. Focusrite Interface - Yamaha HS80 Monitors, Audio Technica ATH M50 headphones. Logitech G600 mouse. Comfy Chair, 2 Pg Tips chimps.

Post Reply

Return to “Older Cubase versions”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 5 guests