Page 3 of 13

Re: Cubase 10 rumores, expectations, hopes, etc.?

Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2018 3:11 pm
by James K
Get rid of those ridiculous round pop up menus on either side of the panners. A right click for menu access to the panner state will do.

Re: Cubase 10 rumores, expectations, hopes, etc.?

Posted: Wed Aug 29, 2018 5:47 am
by Sonik
1. Mono / Stereo conversion directly, an easy way, without bouncing (like on PT)
2. Variaudio button for bypass for all tracks or selected tracks
3. VU meter when it's on direct monitoring rec
4. Moving tracks on the mixer
5. Improve and update old Cubase VST plugs, with better GUI, resize, Undo...
6. Scales on Variaudio, and improve the algo (better low notes detection, for examples...)
7. Navigating and Editing names in the mixer using the TAB, as on the project
8. Link tracks on the project
9. Sample Accurate Automation
10. Link automation for multiple tracks

Re: Cubase 10 rumores, expectations, hopes, etc.?

Posted: Wed Aug 29, 2018 12:22 pm
by J-S-Q
I hope for some improvements or at LEAST bug fixes for Eucon.

Re: Cubase 10 rumores, expectations, hopes, etc.?

Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2018 4:12 am
by James K
Sonik wrote:
Wed Aug 29, 2018 5:47 am
1. Mono / Stereo conversion directly, an easy way, without bouncing (like on PT)
2. Variaudio bypass for all tracks or selected tracks
3. VU meter when it's on direct monitoring rec
4. Moving tracks on the mixer
5. Improve and update old Cubase VST plugs, with better GUI, resize, Undo...
6. Scales on Variaudio, and improve the algo (better low notes detection, for examples...)
These are good.

I'll add:
The ability to save preset chains in the offline processing.( like Nuedo has )

An actual button to quickly access and show the current state of pre and post fader.

Get rid of the circle pop-up menus on other side of the panners in exchange for a right-click context menu to access panner states.

Eliminate the double click to open a plug-in and replace it with a single click. ( as it is a double click opens the plugin faster than a single click )

Replace midi tracks for multi out instruments with instrument tracks for all like logic pro and Studio One has.

Re: Cubase 10 rumores, expectations, hopes, etc.?

Posted: Fri Aug 31, 2018 10:37 pm
by johnstaf
AAF. Nuendo Lite, sorry Cubase Pro, would benefit hugely from having basic pro audio features enabled. I have to use either Logic or Pyramix to open projects from other DAWs.

Re: Cubase 10 rumores, expectations, hopes, etc.?

Posted: Fri Aug 31, 2018 10:57 pm
by mozizo
i wish to see new asio driver that can see all audio devices,and use all of them in cubase.
wonder why there is such limitation for one hardware at a time,its been long time that way.

Re: Cubase 10 rumores, expectations, hopes, etc.?

Posted: Sun Sep 02, 2018 2:39 am
by quantum7
zooterman wrote:
Wed Aug 15, 2018 9:31 pm
The ability to hide open plugin windows rather than have to close them to get some added view real estate. That way could easily toggle between seeing multiple plugin screens you're working on and hiding them as you please.
I would also like this.

Re: Cubase 10 rumores, expectations, hopes, etc.?

Posted: Sun Sep 02, 2018 2:42 am
by quantum7
Sonik wrote:
Wed Aug 29, 2018 5:47 am
4. Moving tracks on the mixer
Yes!

Re: Cubase 10 rumores, expectations, hopes, etc.?

Posted: Sun Sep 02, 2018 5:46 am
by PulsePsycle
Two tiny wishes.
MIDI clock destinations and MIDI timecode destinations per project. Now this is 'global'.
A bigger scroll menu for both and a scroll bar for MIDI clock destinations.

Re: Cubase 10 rumores, expectations, hopes, etc.?

Posted: Sun Sep 02, 2018 7:42 pm
by peakae
Hit point detection finally fixed.

Re: Cubase 10 rumores, expectations, hopes, etc.?

Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2018 4:35 pm
by theRoyal1
We should rename this thread:
"Things that have been complained about for years but have yet to be fixed".

Re: Cubase 10 rumores, expectations, hopes, etc.?

Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2018 5:40 pm
by mart
theRoyal1 wrote:
Mon Sep 03, 2018 4:35 pm
We should rename this thread:
"Things that have been complained about for years but have yet to be fixed".
Agreed.

I'd pay 1000 Euro for Cubase 10 if they only completed the features half heartedly introduced... e.g. Folder Sync (does not work), Import from Song (all types and without media), Direct Offline Processing, VariAudio (be as good as Melodyne or just give us ARA 2 for Melodyne and forget it). Add track Dialog (give the option for the Input as well as the output).. etc I do NOT want to see a new synth or halion content or ANOTHER interface revamp (yawn) .

Re: Cubase 10 rumores, expectations, hopes, etc.?

Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2018 6:09 pm
by Manike
What was that mode they had where the screen just went black and you had to listen instead of look at what you're doing.

Should bring that back :D

Re: Cubase 10 rumores, expectations, hopes, etc.?

Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2018 6:53 pm
by mart
Manike wrote:
Mon Sep 03, 2018 6:09 pm
What was that mode they had where the screen just went black and you had to listen instead of look at what you're doing.

Should bring that back :D
'busted monitor mode' I think :-)

Re: Cubase 10 rumores, expectations, hopes, etc.?

Posted: Tue Sep 04, 2018 9:02 pm
by smapmap
Being able to record another take on the same track whilst still being able to hear what's being played on the track. Could do that in Sonar 1 in 2000.

Re: Cubase 10 rumores, expectations, hopes, etc.?

Posted: Wed Sep 05, 2018 9:54 am
by mart
smapmap wrote:
Tue Sep 04, 2018 9:02 pm
Being able to record another take on the same track whilst still being able to hear what's being played on the track. Could do that in Sonar 1 in 2000.
Can’t see a use case in that in terms of audio ?!

Re: Cubase 10 rumores, expectations, hopes, etc.?

Posted: Thu Sep 06, 2018 7:15 am
by Bill_T
Can we possibly make setting up Articulation Maps a little more confusing? I have often come dangerously close to understanding how to do it. Would be nice if we had to enter basically the same information 5 or 6 times, instead of only 3.

Re: Cubase 10 rumores, expectations, hopes, etc.?

Posted: Thu Sep 06, 2018 8:14 am
by noiseboyuk
Bill_T wrote:
Thu Sep 06, 2018 7:15 am
Can we possibly make setting up Articulation Maps a little more confusing? I have often come dangerously close to understanding how to do it. Would be nice if we had to enter basically the same information 5 or 6 times, instead of only 3.
Ha - I never got there. Tried in real anger several times... real anger....

Re: Cubase 10 rumores, expectations, hopes, etc.?

Posted: Thu Sep 06, 2018 11:18 am
by Manike
I hope they dont focus on VST transit. Thats dullll.

Re: Cubase 10 rumores, expectations, hopes, etc.?

Posted: Thu Sep 06, 2018 11:34 am
by DarrenGlen
i would upgrade Cubase instantly to C10 if it had 3 new things:

1:/ VSTm plugins....ie ability to "plug in" different mixer algorithms. Not just the "vanilla" one it currently has. I want to be able to buy an "SSL VSTm" and have the mixdown algorithm change to sound like SSL and the mixer channel graphics to change accordingly to suit and look like an SSL mixer strip. I dont want to be doing this in a convoluted way with plugins and linking etc etc. It should be clean and neat and incorporated properly into the mixer section, not as a "Bolt-on" how it currently works with 3rd party options. Its a whole new potential market that Steinberg could open up.

2:/ Ability to move mixer channels left and right independently. Untied from track order how it currently is.

ie: viewtopic.php?f=252&t=139936

3:/ Ability to rename VST3 plugin names to what i want in the plugin manager. Simple and logical and reasonable request i would have thought.

Cheers!
Darren.

Re: Cubase 10 rumores, expectations, hopes, etc.?

Posted: Thu Sep 06, 2018 12:09 pm
by smapmap
mart wrote:
Wed Sep 05, 2018 9:54 am
smapmap wrote:
Tue Sep 04, 2018 9:02 pm
Being able to record another take on the same track whilst still being able to hear what's being played on the track. Could do that in Sonar 1 in 2000.
Can’t see a use case in that in terms of audio ?!
Sure.

1) Record a guitar part
2) Listen back -hear a segment which needs fixed
3) Arm guitar track for recording new section
4) Hit record

What happens?
1) all audio on the guitar track is muted

Impact
1) no context for dropping in your part

Workaround
1)Create a temp new track
2) Record onto another track (so you can hear the previous part) and then move the fixed part into the first track
3) Delete temporary track

Solution
In Sonar and other DAWs you can record onto any track and the DAW plays back any audio to avoiding the need for workarounds - bascially it works like midi

Re: Cubase 10 rumores, expectations, hopes, etc.?

Posted: Thu Sep 06, 2018 12:36 pm
by Manike
smapmap wrote:
Thu Sep 06, 2018 12:09 pm


What happens?
1) all audio on the guitar track is muted

This is what punching in is for. Either use locators to choose a punch in section or hit play and then record when you hit the section you want to replace. This gives the musician context.


Your way the musician will be hearing the mistake as they play also.

Re: Cubase 10 rumores, expectations, hopes, etc.?

Posted: Thu Sep 06, 2018 1:43 pm
by sasha-che
There are some clever suggestions in this thread. However, I kind of gave up waiting for anything useful in new versions of Cubase. I even quit hoping they won't worsen something (like they already did several times).

I guess it's better to be content with what I have now and just concentrate on work. In fact, I still use 8.5 even as I own 9.5, mainly because I need to use video engine all the time, and new video engine won't work under OSX Mavericks 10.9.5. And there are NO features in 9.5 for me which would make me want to upgrade my system.

Re: Cubase 10 rumores, expectations, hopes, etc.?

Posted: Thu Sep 06, 2018 3:10 pm
by smapmap
Manike wrote:
Thu Sep 06, 2018 12:36 pm
smapmap wrote:
Thu Sep 06, 2018 12:09 pm


What happens?
1) all audio on the guitar track is muted

This is what punching in is for. Either use locators to choose a punch in section or hit play and then record when you hit the section you want to replace. This gives the musician context.


Your way the musician will be hearing the mistake as they play also.
Agree however the problem is no two takes are ever the same so so it can create audible artefacts where the join is. Ideally you'd want to cross fade them. In Sonar and other DAWs you just delete the offending section, hit record,play along. Hit stop, slip edit and cross fade to suit.

Re: Cubase 10 rumores, expectations, hopes, etc.?

Posted: Thu Sep 06, 2018 3:15 pm
by eightyeightkeys
quantum7 wrote:
Sun Sep 02, 2018 2:42 am
Sonik wrote:
Wed Aug 29, 2018 5:47 am
4. Moving tracks on the mixer
Yes!
+1